Monday, January 21, 2008

CRB denies SoundExchange's request for rehearing for Satellite radio rates

The CRB ruled that Sat Radio would pay 6.0% (increasing to 8.0% by 2012) of their adjusted gross revenues. Apparently, SoundExchange doesn't like the exceptions to the gross revenue that the CRB allowed.
On December 3, 2007, the Copyright Royalty Judges (“Judges”) issued a Determination of Rates and Terms in this matter (“Initial Determination”). Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 803(c)(2) and 37 C.F.R. Part 353, SoundExchange, Inc. (“SoundExchange”) filed a motion for rehearing “to reconsider the definition of Gross Revenues set forth at pages 28-31 of the [Initial] Determination; and, in light of recent predictions that approval of the XM/Sirius merger is imminent, reconsider its unwillingness to assess the impact of a merger as part of its [Initial] Determination.” The Judges permitted a response and XM Satellite Radio, Inc. (“XM”) and Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc. (“Sirius”) (collectively, the “SDARS”) filed a timely response, opposing the motion. The Judges now deny this motion. Nevertheless, as discussed below, the Judges have determined that one limited area of the Initial Determination warrants clarification.
PDF of full decision here.

Labels: , , , ,

2 Comments:

Blogger mitrich said...

Hey Rusty-

This whole CRB thing seems to have gone to sleep. Is there still anything in Congress? Is there behind-the-scenes stuff going on we don't know about?

I have your stick-ons up all over my office.

Best,

RSM in New Jersey

January 22, 2008 5:45 AM  
Blogger Fred said...

When the webcasting rates came down, John Simson said it was sour grapes for the webcasters to try to overturn the CRB determination because the process had been "fair" and everyone had been given the opportunity to present their views to the CRB.

I wonder what's different now?

January 22, 2008 7:59 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home