Small Commercial Webcasters stance on the SoundExchange offer (via David Oxenford)
Here's what David wrote in RAIN:
While there has been much in the press about SoundExchange extending the SWSA [Small Webcaster Settlement Act of 2002], that really is not what happened. They simply made a preliminary, conditional offer to settle the case to the group of independent commercial webcasters that I represented in the CRB proceeding .
Their offer is to extend the SWSA with some "tweaks" that are yet to be negotiated. An SWSA extension would limit small webcasters to $1.2 million in revenue, and once they earned a dollar more, all their performances back to the beginning of the year in which they exceed the cap would be subject to the CRB per performance royalties, effectively exceeding their revenues by many multiples.
While the $1.2 million cap was fine in 2002 when it was used in the SWSA negotiations, it doesn't work in 2007. This would effectively limit the independent webcaster's growth and investment opportunities, as who would invest in an entity with an absolute cap on their financial growth?
While my clients are pleased that SoundExchange has finally made us a proposal -- after we have been requesting one for the past two years -- their offer is simply to extend the SWSA with some modifications that they want. We are studying these proposed modifications. The independent webcasters have suggested modifications of our own to the SWSA, modifications which were not addressed in the SoundExchange proposal.
We welcome this proposal as what it is: the first step in a negotiation process which we hope to be able to conduct in a business-like fashion in the coming weeks, rather than one negotiated through press releases.
That statement is in sync with SomaFM's position on this, although usually my wording isn't quite as nice as Davids. :-)
Labels: crb, scw, soundexchange, swsa

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home